We’re now onto our final blog posts, where we’re exploring the extent to which the “national brand” our country has conveyed through its performances (from our second blog posts) aligns with the country’s dominant national identity (from our first blog posts) and its social/political/cultural context (from the MP4 narrated briefings we recorded early in the quarter).
Part of our task is to draw conclusions from this (mis)alignment, whether about the country’s view of Eurovision or its attitudes to nation branding.
As in previous posts, we’re all using the APA system for both in-text citations and a full references list. Please feel free to ignore those details if they get in the way of your reading.
We DO value your feedback!
Please leave your constructive comments at the end of our posts. Although we won’t have opportunity to revise this post (since it is now the end of Finals Week), your feedback can help us as we think about writing assignments in our remaining studies.
And who might “we” be?
The "we" on this site refers to a group of 20 first-year undergraduate students at Seattle University who, over the space of 10 weeks, have learned more about the Eurovision Song Contest than we could ever have imagined.
We appreciate that you’ve been following us on this Eurovision odyssey. Some of us are hooked on it; some of us can’t get away fast enough. And none of us will ever be quite the same.
Thank you for engaging with our work!
One last time, here are the links our individual country blog sites:
BALKAN:
ALB Albania | BIH Bosnia & Herzegovina | MKD North Macedonia | SRB Serbia
BALTIC:
EST Estonia | FIN Finland | LAT Latvia | LTU Lithuania
CAUCASUS/C.I.S.:
ARM Armenia | AZE Azerbaijan | GEO Georgia | RUS Russia
EASTERN:
BUL Bulgaria | GRE Greece | MDA Moldova | ROM Romania
CENTRAL:
AUT Austria | CZE Czech Republic | HUN Hungary | SLO Slovenia



